𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗶𝗱𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽: 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗙𝗮𝗶𝗹, 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗲

Featuring insights from Michelle Shriver, SVP of Hospitality at Foxwoods Resort Casino, and Yipy CEO Adam Tuttle.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝗜𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽. 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗜𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗼𝗿.

Every hotel has strong leaders. GMs who walk the floor. VPs who jump in when things go sideways. Supervisors who hold it together shift after shift.

Thanks for reading The Standards Playbook! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

But as Michelle Shriver told us in our recent conversation, stepping in isn’t leadership—it’s compensation.

𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆’𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴.

Michelle spent 18 years as EVP at Ameristar, helping grow the company from a few small properties to a regional powerhouse with over $1.2 billion in revenue. Now she oversees hospitality at Foxwoods Resort Casino—9 million square feet of operation with an average employee tenure over 10 years.

Her conclusion? The organizations that scale aren’t the ones with the best leaders. They’re the ones where the system works whether the leader is present or not.

👉 Watch the conversation with Michelle here.

𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲 𝗦𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗧𝗮𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗨𝘀 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝘃𝘀. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗶𝗰𝘀

𝟭. 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝗜𝗻 𝗕𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗦𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗜𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴

As Michelle put it:

“𝘐 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱 𝘪𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴𝘯’𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩, 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯, 𝘰𝘳 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬—𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯.”

This is the trap most hotels fall into:

The GM who reviews every banquet space before every meeting. The VP who becomes the “get it done” person everyone relies on. The supervisor who personally holds every shift together.

Michelle’s insight: “𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘦𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝘮𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘶𝘳𝘦—𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘬𝘭𝘺, 𝘐 𝘩𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘢𝘺 𝘪𝘵, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘢 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘶𝘳𝘦. 𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨—𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘧𝘰𝘳.”

Operating is doing. Leading is building.

𝟮. “𝗧𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆’𝘀 𝗚𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗕𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗕𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗦𝗼-𝗮𝗻𝗱-𝗦𝗼 𝗜𝘀 𝗢𝗻 𝗦𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁” 𝗜𝘀 𝗮 𝗪𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝗶𝗴𝗻

Michelle described the telltale moment:

“𝘐𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘧𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬, ‘𝘞𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺’𝘴 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘰-𝘢𝘯𝘥-𝘴𝘰 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘧𝘵.’ 𝘕𝘰—𝘪𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘥𝘢𝘺. 𝘐𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘰’𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘧𝘵. 𝘐𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨—𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘰.”

This is the difference between person-dependent and system-dependent operations.

When relief comes from who’s working instead of how things work, you don’t have consistency. You have luck.

𝟯. 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗽𝘀 𝗕𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗜𝘁 𝗕𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲

When asked at what point leadership becomes compensation, Michelle was direct:

“𝘐 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘪𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘧𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭. 𝘈 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘫𝘶𝘮𝘱 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨’𝘴 𝘰𝘧𝘧.”

And then she named the deeper problem:

“𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵—𝘸𝘰𝘸. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮. 𝘉𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘦? 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦? 𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘧𝘵?”

The greatest measure of a leader isn’t that they’re missed because no one can do the work. It’s that they’re missed because they built a team that can.

𝟰. 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗚𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗘𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻

Michelle has been blessed to work for companies with strong cultures—including Foxwoods, a tribal property where the average tenure exceeds 10 years.

But she was clear about culture’s limits:

“𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘶𝘱. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘶𝘱 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘺—𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦—𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘺—𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘪𝘴𝘯’𝘵 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘪𝘵. 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘢 𝘥𝘢𝘺-𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘢𝘺-𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘴.”

Her conclusion: “𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘴 𝘶𝘱 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮—𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘢 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘢 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮.”

Culture defines intent. Systems enable delivery.

𝟱. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗛𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗗𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗜𝘁 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗖𝗮𝗻𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗜𝘁

Michelle emphasized the foundation most hotels skip:

“𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘵. 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴 𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘵 𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘵? 𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘸𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘶𝘱, 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘺, 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘺—𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘤, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘢𝘴 ‘𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦.’ 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯: 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭𝘴?”

Adam Tuttle reinforced this point: “𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥, 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘤𝘩. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥, 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘵.”

And then Michelle completed the loop: “𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘰 𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘪𝘹 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘢𝘺.”

Standards are a living, breathing document. Not a shelf decoration.

𝟲. “𝗪𝗲 𝗗𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗛𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮 𝗖𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴” 𝗜𝘀 𝗮 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗽

When asked about properties that resist auditing, Michelle was clear:

“𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨. 𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨. 𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘢, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘢—𝘰𝘩 𝘮𝘺 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴.”

Adam added a hot take: “𝘈𝘯𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘯 ‘𝘢𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦’—𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘸𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴. 𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘦 𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴, 𝘣𝘺 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘴: 𝘥𝘰 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘵?”

The reality: auditing is happening with your participation or without it. One helps you. One hurts you.

Michelle then reframed what auditing should look like:

“𝘐𝘧 𝘸𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘰𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 ‘𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘐 𝘥𝘰 𝘸𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨?’—𝘪𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘮𝘦𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘰𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩. 𝘠𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮. 𝘐𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘢𝘺, ‘𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘫𝘰𝘣. 𝘐’𝘮 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘵—𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵.’”

Auditing isn’t about catching people. It’s about coaching them.

𝟳. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗜𝘀 𝗘𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴—𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗥𝗮𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀

Michelle described how guest expectations have shifted:

“𝘚𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘸—𝘐 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘭𝘺. 𝘐 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺. 𝘐𝘧 𝘐 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘬, 𝘐 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘨𝘰 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘬𝘪𝘰𝘴𝘬 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘪𝘤𝘬 𝘶𝘱 𝘮𝘺 𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘮 𝘬𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘶𝘱 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘺 𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘮—𝘐’𝘮 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘺. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯’𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘦. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢 𝘧𝘦𝘸 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘴.”

Adam connected this to why consistency matters more than ever:

“𝘐𝘧 𝘐 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯’𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘈𝘥𝘢𝘮 𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘤𝘬-𝘪𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘰 𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘦, 𝘐 𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘣𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘐 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯’𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺. 𝘐’𝘮 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧𝘧 𝘰𝘧 𝘻𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘔𝘢𝘺𝘣𝘦 𝘐’𝘮 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘸𝘰 𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘐 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘥 20 𝘰𝘳 30.”

His conclusion: “𝘞𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘰 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦.”

Fewer touchpoints means each one carries more weight. Consistency isn’t optional anymore—it’s survival.

𝟴. 𝗜𝘀 𝗜𝘁 𝗮 𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺?

When asked how to tell the difference, Michelle gave a clear diagnostic:

“𝘐𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦?𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯. 𝘔𝘺 𝘵𝘰𝘱 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘱 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘺 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘦. 𝘐𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦, 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘢 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮. 𝘞𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘯’𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘶𝘱 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺. 𝘞𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘯’𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨. 𝘞𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘯’𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘰𝘳.”

She added a nuance: “𝘐𝘧 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘧𝘵, 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮—𝘢 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘧𝘵. 𝘐𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘧𝘵—𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘵 𝘶𝘱 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘧𝘵. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘧 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘧𝘵𝘴, 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦—𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦’𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴.”

The diagnostic is simple:

• One person? Coaching opportunity.

• One shift? Leadership issue.

• Multiple shifts, multiple people? Systems problem.

𝟵. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗟𝗼𝗻𝗴-𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗺 𝗖𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀

When asked about the true cost of depending on heroic leaders instead of systems, Michelle was direct:

“𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳, 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴—𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘢 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘺 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬, 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯. 𝘖𝘳 ‘𝘐’𝘮 𝘩𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘺, 𝘸𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘶𝘭, 𝘴𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘵, 𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺’𝘳𝘦 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘦.’ 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘦. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘶𝘯𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦.𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘵.”

Adam underscored the point with Foxwoods as proof:

“9 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘵. 𝘠𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘱𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘵. 𝘠𝘰𝘶’𝘷𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘶𝘱. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘍𝘰𝘹𝘸𝘰𝘰𝘥𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘺𝘱𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘧𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘴.”

Michelle confirmed: “𝘈𝘣𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺. 𝘞𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘢. 𝘞𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 10 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴. 𝘗𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘧 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘫𝘰𝘣 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵, 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘰—𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘧 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦.”

You don’t get Martha Stewart and Gordon Ramsay putting their names on your property without excellence at scale. And excellence at scale doesn’t come from heroic individuals. It comes from systems that develop people.

𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗠𝗲𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗚𝗠𝘀, 𝗢𝗽𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗧&𝗗 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀

Michelle’s nearly 30 years in hospitality taught her something most hotels still haven’t learned:

Strong leaders can’t compensate for weak systems. And they shouldn’t have to.

Systems only work when:

• Standards are defined before they can be refined

• Culture is translated into behaviors, not just values

• Auditing is coaching, not catching

• Leaders are directional, not reactive

• The organization trusts the system, not just the person

• Every day is a good day—regardless of who’s on shift

This is why the Yipy system is built around a loop—not a library:

👉 Define → Distribute → Deliver → Diagnose → Develop

Because heroics don’t scale. Systems do.

𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗔𝗥𝗗𝗦 𝗦𝗟𝗜𝗣-𝗨𝗣 #𝟬𝟬𝟰: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗼 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿 ≠ 𝗦𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗘𝘅𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲

A property has a VP who’s the “get it done” person. Everyone knows if you need something handled, go to them. They review every banquet setup. They jump in when shifts fall apart. They’re the reason things work.

But then they get promoted. Or they retire. Or they take a vacation.

Result?

Everything they were holding together falls apart. The team doesn’t know what to do without them. Standards that seemed solid were actually dependent on one person’s presence.

This is what Michelle meant when she said:

“𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵—𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮.”

𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗖𝗔𝗡 𝗗𝗢 𝗧𝗢𝗗𝗔𝗬

Here are four high-impact actions to move from heroics to systems:

𝟭. 𝗔𝘀𝗸: “𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗛𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗜 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗲?”

Michelle’s test for leadership: “𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘷𝘦? 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘦?”

If the answer is “things fall apart,” you don’t have a system. You have a dependency.

Identify three things only you can do—and start building the capability for others to do them.

𝟮. 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗕𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗲

Use Michelle’s diagnostic:

• One person struggling? Coaching opportunity.

• One shift struggling? Leadership issue.

• Multiple shifts, multiple people? Systems problem.

Stop solving people problems with training when it’s actually a systems failure.

𝟯. 𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗔𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴

Michelle’s standard: “𝘐𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘢𝘺, ‘𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘪𝘥 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘫𝘰𝘣’ 𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨.”

If your team’s first thought when called into the office is “what did I do wrong?”—you’re not meeting with them often enough.

Document wins, not just misses.

𝟰. 𝗗𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲

Michelle was clear: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘵. 𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘸𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘶𝘱, 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘺, 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘺.”

Pick one area where you’re seeing inconsistency. Before you retrain, ask: “Have we actually defined what success looks like here?”

If you can’t describe it, you can’t measure it. If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗼𝗺 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗲

Michelle Shriver has spent nearly 30 years watching hotels succeed and fail. She’s helped grow a company from a few small properties to over $1.2 billion in revenue. She now oversees 9 million square feet of hospitality at one of the largest resort casino complexes in North America.

Her conclusion?

The hotels that scale aren’t the ones with the best leaders. They’re the ones where the system works whether the leader is there or not.

When leaders are operating instead of leading, it’s not a badge of honor.

It’s a warning sign.

👉 Follow Michelle Shriver on LinkedIn and subscribe to her Substack for more leadership insights.

Find What’s Right

One of the easiest traps for leaders in hospitality is allowing inspections to become exercises in finding failure.

We walk a room looking for dust. We audit a call looking for missed verbiage. We review a shift trying to identify what went wrong. And while there is certainly a place for accountability, I think many leaders miss one of the greatest opportunities inspections actually give us, which is the ability to reinforce what excellence looks like in real time.

The strongest operations I have ever seen were not built on fear of being caught doing something wrong. They were built on teams that became incredibly confident in what doing it right looked and felt like.

That confidence does not happen accidentally.

It is built through teaching, repetition, coaching, inspection, and reinforcement over long periods of time. When we train well, we build competence. When we consistently recognize good execution, we build confidence alongside that competence. And when confidence is built on something real, both tend to grow very quickly.

One practice I recommend to leaders is setting aside thirty minutes every day specifically to find someone doing something right.

Not generally right. Not “good job, everybody.”

Something specific. Be as direct as you can!

Maybe it is a room attendant perfectly staging a room to standard. Maybe it is a front desk agent using recovery language beautifully with a frustrated guest. Maybe it is a server anticipating a need before the guest ever has to ask.

Catch it.

Take a picture. Record a quick video. Share it privately with the employee or publicly with the team when appropriate. Let people know you saw it with your own eyes and heard it with your own ears. The specificity matters because people repeat what gets recognized.

Too often leaders believe inspections should primarily identify gaps, but in reality inspections should also help teams visualize success. When employees can clearly see what winning looks like, consistency becomes much easier to achieve.

A few simple practices help make this work consistently:

1. Set clear expectations. Before inspecting anything, define very clearly what success looks like. Ambiguity creates hesitation. Clarity creates confidence.

2. Teach visually whenever possible. Pictures, demonstrations, role-play, videos, and active stand-up discussions help people understand standards far faster than written policies alone.

3. Give the team time to practice. Sometimes what feels simple to leadership feels entirely unfamiliar to the employee performing it. Repetition matters. Coaching matters. Muscle memory matters.

4. Focus on one initiative at a time. Leaders sometimes overwhelm teams by introducing too many points of emphasis at once. One clear priority executed consistently will outperform five competing priorities every time.

5. Stay present on the floor. Visibility matters. Walking the operation should not feel like hunting for mistakes. It should feel like active coaching and reinforcement.

6. Make praise specific enough to feel real. Repeat exact phrases you heard. Point out exact actions you observed. Generic recognition is quickly forgotten. Detailed recognition builds belief.

7. When correction is needed, make it clear and respectful. Most coaching moments do not require long conversations. Calm, direct feedback delivered consistently builds trust over time.

Hospitality will always require leaders who are willing to step in during difficult moments. That will never change. But the healthiest operations are usually the ones where leadership presence creates confidence instead of dependency.

When teams know exactly what success looks like, when they are trained consistently, and when great performance is reinforced as intentionally as poor performance is corrected, the operation becomes calmer, stronger, and far more sustainable.

And in my experience, those are the environments where both employees and guests feel the difference almost immediately.

Success Story of the Month: The Ritz-Carlton Laguna Niguel

“A Tool to Help Us Get Where We Need to Be”: How a Luxury Ritz-Carlton Resort Is Using Yipy to Sharpen Standards, Testing, and Training